Environmental Impacts of NFT (Non-Fungible Token)

Environmental Impacts of NFT (Non-Fungible Token)

Because of their usefulness, NFTs have been rapidly expanding, particularly in the creative industries. However, NFTs have come under scrutiny due to concerns about their potential influence on the environment in light of rising public awareness of the link between technological advancement, global ecological degradation, and climate change.  Its carbon footprint may depend on how each NFT is produced.


Tokenized assets that are not freely exchangeable are known as non-fungible tokens or NFTs. These tokens may include photography, digital paintings, music, and trading cards. NFTs can be generated through the process of minting, and their details are added to the blockchain. Each newly created token has a unique cryptographic fingerprint associated with a specific blockchain address. Each token has a known owner, and that owner’s details are made public. Tokens may be differentiated even if thousands of identical NFTs are created.

One obvious advantage of NFTs is the improvement in market efficiency. By using NFTs on the blockchain to represent digital or actual artwork, dealers may bypass middlemen and reach buyers directly.

The value that the market and their owners assign to NFTs determines whether or not they may be sold and swapped for fiat currency, cryptocurrency, or even other NFTs. In fact, an NFT may fetch millions in price from specific buyers, while others would not value it.

Its Environmental Impact

Using blockchain-based NFTs in traditional storage techniques releases millions of tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

Memo Akten, a digital artist, evaluated about 18,000 NFTs and determined that each one had a carbon footprint greater than that of the typical European Union resident for more than a month’s power. It has an environmental impact equivalent to an estimated 21.35 metric tons of carbon dioxide released into the air. In the Ethereum network, most NFTs are kept and exchanged using the mining process to verify transactions. Ethereum uses around 44.94 terawatt-hours of electricity annually, nearly the same as the yearly power usage of nations like Qatar and Hungary. A piece of Ethereum art with a single edition may generate as much carbon dioxide as it would take to fly for one hour.

New Ways of Burning Mechanisms

generating NFTs

Artists have adopted a variety of steps to prevent climate change and lower their NFT carbon footprint as awareness of their influence on the environment has grown. Some NFTs on blockchain systems utilizing the proof-of-stake protocol do not need excessive energy consumption or other resources that would harm the environment. On the other hand, blockchains based on proof-of-work allow miners to utilize green energy to run their minting processes.

Also, the environmental effect of generating NFTs may be reduced or eliminated if a widespread transition to renewable energy occurs. Several NFTs have fetched outstanding prices, allowing investors to put part of those funds into renewable energy projects. The money made from selling NFTs may also be used toward developing cutting-edge technologies that aim to slow or even halt global warming. Some have high hopes for a new experimental method called carbon capture and storage, which involves piping carbon dioxide emissions underground.

Photo Attribution:

1st and featured image by https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/UFESLT8MzQoDaA3UDkjDSj-1200-80.jpg

2nd image by https://ddc514qh7t05d.cloudfront.net/dA/333f48dfddd83b545df645195d1d308a/2400w/80q

Share This

About the author